Madison v. Neuburger

The language complained of in paragraph 3 of the answer manifestly fails to comply with the requirements of section 261 of the Civil Practice Act. It constitutes neither a general nor a specific denial of any allegation of the complaint or of knowledge or information thereof sufficient to form a belief. It is equally deficient as a statement of new matter constituting a defense or counterclaim. It is impossible to ascertain from the language objected to whether the defendant denies or admits the allegations of the complaint referred to in paragraph 3 of the answer. If defendant is ignorant of…