Legal Opinion
Shockley v. Minner
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 25, 2010No. C.A. 06-478-JJFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Governor Ruth Ann Minner’s Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 63). For the reasons to be discussed, this Motion will be denied.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Corporal Timothy Shockley (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action against Defendants Governor Ruth Ann Minner, Colonel Thomas F. MacLeish, and the Division of State Police, Department of Safety and Homeland Security of the State of Delaware pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that he was denied a promotion on the basis of intentional gender discrimination in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Timothy Shockley v. Ruth MinnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- C.R. Bard Incorporated v. Atrium Medical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022