Burrill v. S. N. Wilcox Lumber Co.

This controversy arises out of a transaction wherein the plaintiff loaned her son the sum of $2,500 in the spring of 1881, and took a chattel mortgage on the shingle-mill and all the appurtenances, which be bought with the money, for her security.

*573In the fall of 1882, the son, E. C. Burrill, contracted for the purchase of a certain piece of land of the defendant company, and moved the mill on the land. The contract contained the following clause, viz.:

“And that the buildings and improvements placed and made upon said premises by or under the said party of the second part, his representatives…