Legal Opinion

Farrell v. City of Dubuque

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Dubuque District Gourt.— Hon. M. C. Matthews, Judge. Action to recover ' damages for injuries received tbrougb the alleged negligence of defendant in allowing an unsafe structure to be constructed and remain in the stree! of defendant city. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,500.- From judgment on this verdict, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, C. J.

1- otXAwi?nesses. I. Plaintiff'was examined as a witness on her own behalf, and on cross-examination defendant was allowed over objection to bring out the-fact that she had lived in various houses subsequently 1° ker marriage and prior to the injury. This evidence was admitted, as appears from'a remark of the court, for the purpose of affecting her credibility. On redirect examination she was- asked, as to each house_which she had thus occupied, whether she had paid her rent, and over defendant’s objection was allowed to answer that she had. ' The defendant, having gone into this general…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Trapnell v. City of Red Oak JunctionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Bliven v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. City of Richmond v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Owen v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Cason v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strand v. Grinnell Automobile Garage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Malchow v. City of LeotiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Armstrong v. WaffleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Warren v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Armstrong v. WaffleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API