Legal Opinion

Owen v. City of Fort Dodge

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 16, 1896PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Webster District Court.— Hon. S. M. Weaver, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff, by reason of a defective sidewalk, or crossing, in tbe defendant city. There was a trial to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

On the evening of the fourteenth day of October, 1892, the plaintiff, while attempting to pass over a plank street crossing, in the defendant city, stepped between the boards there laid, and received the injuries of which she complains. She alleged that the crossing on which she was injured was at the corner of Cass and Locust streets, being the southeast corner of block 11, in Morrison and Huncombe’s *283addition to the city, at the southwest corner of of Cass, at its intersection with Locust street, and on the north side of Locust street; that the crossing, as originally constructed, was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Fassett v. Town of RoxburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  3. Trapnell v. City of Red Oak JunctionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Brown v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  5. Barnes v. Town of MarcusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Keyes v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Baxter v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Neeley v. Incorporated Town of MapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Buchmeier v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Howe v. Sioux CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API