In Re Tanner
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the Supreme Court to obtain a release from the state prison. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petition sufficiently shows that the term of imprisonment in the state prison, which petitioner was lawfully adjudged to suffer, has not expired, unless he is entitled to be credited with certain time during which he was confined in the Ohio state prison at Columbus. It appears that while imprisoned in the California state prison at San Quentin under the judgment, he was released on parole, but that his parole was subsequently revoked, and he was declared an escaped prisoner, because he had left the state of California without permission. Subsequently, upon conviction of a crime…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hesley v. RagenIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re SichofskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Jennings v. HuntSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- In re CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lander v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.