Legal Opinion

In re CM

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 2016No. Docket No. 322913Published

1Opinion of the CourtBoonstra, P.J.

This case returns to this Court on remand from our Supreme Court.1 At issue is the trial court’s determination that the Mackinac County Child Care Fund (MCCCF) was not responsible for the payment of any cost or administrative rate connected with supervision of foster-care placements. We conclude that, because no statute specifically provides the MCCCF with any such insulation for the time frame in question, the court erred by so concluding. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order in that regard and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. PERTINENT FACTS AND…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oakland County v. State of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Edgewood Development Inc. v. LandskroenerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. EDGEWOOD DEV. INC. v. LandskroenerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Ottawa County v. Family Independence AgencyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In re CMMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API