Legal Opinion

Concerning the Application for Water Rights of County of Boulder in Boulder County v. Boulder & Weld County Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 21, 2016No. Supreme Court Case No. 14SA348PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hood

¶ 1 Boulder County is developing a property known as the Bailey Farm into a public open-space park which will feature several ponds formed when abandoned gravel pits filled with groundwater. Because two of the pits-turned-ponds exposed groundwater after January 1, 1981, the County must replace out-of-priority stream1 depletions caused by evaporation from those ponds. See § 87-90-137(ll)(a)-(b), C.R.S. (2015). To meet this obligation, the County filed an application for underground wáter rights, approval of a plan for augmentation, a change of water rights, ánd an appropriative right of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Simpson v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  2. Coors Brewing Co. v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API