Legal Opinion

Kershbaum v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1926No. Appeal, 316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This is an action to recover losses under a policy of credit insurance. The relevant clauses of the policy are as follows:

“No loss is covered by this policy unless the debtor to whom the goods were shipped and delivered shall have in the latest published book of R. Gr. Dun & Company Mercantile Agency, at the date of shipment, a capital rating and its accompanying credit rating as tabulated below. The books of the said Mercantile Agency shall respectively govern shipments......except where the mercantile agency increases or reduces a rating by report, compiled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Com. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Kershbaum v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Athens National Bank v. Ridgebury TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Sacre v. Victor L. Sacre People's Savings BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  3. Schware v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Huron v. SchomakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API