Legal Opinion
LaMarcus Ealy v. Pinkerton Government Services
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2013No. 12-1252UnpublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
This dispute arises in the context of an action brought by private service employees for allegedly unpaid wages while working for Pinkerton Government Services, Inc. (“Pinkerton”), a government contractor at Andrews Air Force Base. 1 The district court granted the employees’ motion for class certification and Pinkerton filed this appeal. Pinkerton seeks review of the district court’s grant of class certification as well as review of an earlier denial of its motion for summary…
3Cases cited27 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by45 opinions
- Luanna Scott v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- M.D. v. PerryDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Soutter v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Industrial Services Group, Inc. v. Josh DobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Thomas v. FTS USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.