Nesselrode v. Parish
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Guthrie. District Oou/rt. This is a jnoceeding under tbe statute asking tbe appointment of a commissioner to establish a lost corner. Tbe plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Seevers, Ch. J.
i. prachce: tocSbiish jurisdiction. -I. Tbe petition states tbe plaintiff is tbe owner of tbe N. W. \ of Sec. 14, T. 79, R; 31, and tbat tbe northwest corner of said land is in dispute and lost or destroyed. Including tbe defendant Parish thirty-five persons were made defendants, and it was stated tbat they were tbe only land owners tbat would be “affected by tbe proceedings sought herein.” Certain named defendants were stated to be non-residents, and certain others minors. '
Tbe defendant Parish alone answered tbe petition, and denied tbe corner was destroyed or lost. The court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nesselroad v. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Titus v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Soukup v. Union Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Lawler v. Counties of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Fair v. County of IdaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.