Farley v. Wilmington & New Castle Electric Railway Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
The facts appear in the charge of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Lore, C. J.,
charging the jury:
Gentlemen of the jury:—The plaintiff in the above stated two cases claims that on the second day of July, 1900, while Victorine A. Farley, the wife of the said John P. Farley, the plaintiff, was crossing the railway of the defendant in the public highway at Pyle’s Crossing in New Castle Hundred in this county, she was injured through the negligence of the defendant company.
That at that time, while with due care on her part, she was riding with one Horace P. Adams, as a gratuitous passenger, with him in his carriage, drawn by his horse, under his management and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dyer v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Cuddy v. HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Brickell v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. LapsleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Brommer v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Campbell v. WalkerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
- Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. Le BarrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.