Legal Opinion

Ice Delivery Co. of Spokane v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1926No. 19543. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The Ice Delivery Company of Spokane, a corporation, commenced this action against Newell S. Davis seeking injunctive relief, “for such length of time as to the court may seem reasonable,” against the defendant, preventing him from serving or soliciting ice customers of the plaintiff, known to the defendant as such by virtue of his former employment with plaintiff, for his present employer or any other employer except plaintiff, over a route known as the Roekwood route, or any part of it, in the city of Spokane, and from interfering in any way with the business of the plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Fulton Grand Laundry Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Garst v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National School Studios, Inc. v. Superior School Photo Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Racine v. BenderWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Dowell v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Excelsior Laundry Co. v. DiehlNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Jewel Tea Co. v. GrissomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API