Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richard M. Ragsdale v. Bernard J. Turnock, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 12, 1988No. 85-3242Published

1DissentCoffey, Circuit Judge

A decade and one-half ago the Supreme Court announced “that the right of personal privacy includes the abortion decision, but that this right is not unqualified and must be considered against important state interests in regulation.” Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 154, 93 S.Ct. 705, 727, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). Today, under the guise of protecting the woman’s constitutional privacy rights, the majority holds that the State of Illinois’ health services statutory scheme, enacted in an attempt to regulate the ever-escalating costs of medical care without sacrificing its citizens’ health and safety,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API