Legal Opinion

State v. Neal

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 6, 1976No. 2 CA-CR 777PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellant was indicted for assaulting Frank Samuelson, Marion Parker and Gerald Spence with a deadly weapon — a shotgun. After a jury trial he was found not guilty of assault with a deadly weapon but guilty of the lesser included offense of exhibiting a deadly weapon other than in self-defense.

On appeal he contends the court erred (1) in the forms of verdict submitted to the jury, (2) by restricting defense counsel’s re-cross-examination, (3) in the giving of certain instructions and (4) by improperly commenting upon the evidence.

The facts taken in the light most…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AndrewsArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. State v. ThornbrughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Nardelli v. T. C. Triplett Building Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. WaringCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas Boaz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API