Legal Opinion

The" City of Hartford" and The" Unit"

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1878No. 185PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Hudson S. Rideout and others, owners of the schooner “ Abbie S. Oakes,” and Charles Robinson, owner of her cargo, filed their separate libels in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the steamboat “City of Hartford ” and the steam-tug “ Unit,” to recover, the first $8,000, and the second $4,500, damages, occasioned by the sinking of the schooner in East…

Read the full summary

Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Hudson S. Rideout and others, owners of the schooner “ Abbie S. Oakes,” and Charles Robinson, owner of her cargo, filed their separate libels in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the steamboat “City of Hartford ” and the steam-tug “ Unit,” to recover, the first $8,000, and the second $4,500, damages, occasioned by the sinking of the schooner in East River, New York, which was caused bj^ a collision between the “ City of Hartford ” and her while she was in tow by the “…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

delivered the opinion of.the court.

Freedom from fault is a good defence in a cause of collision, even when the suit is promoted to recover compensation for injuries received by an unoffending party; but the innocent party, if the collision was occasioned by the fault of the other vessel or vessels,- is always entitled to full compensation for the injuries received, unless the loss exceeds the amount of the interest which the owners have in the offending ship or ships and the freight pending at the time of the collision. 9 Stat. 635; The Atlas, 93 U. S. 302.

Sufficient appears to show that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. The "Atlas."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The Washington and the GregorySupreme Court of the United States · 1870

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Petitions of the Kinsman Transit Company, as Owner and Operator of the Steamer MacGilvray Shiras, and of Midland Steamship Line, Inc., as Owner and Operator of the Steamer Michael K. Tewksbury, Their Engines, Etc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, City of Buffalo, Claimant-Respondent-Appellant, Kelley Island New York Corporation, Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. In re Kinsman Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. The HudsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API