Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Chapman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1998No. 83223, 83241, 83312 and 83404PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Freeman

delivered the opinion of the .court:

The question presented for our review in these consolidated appeals is whether the Judicial Redistricting Act of 1997 comports with the mandates of the Illinois Constitution. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it does not.

BACKGROUND

The Redistricting Act of 1997

The 89th Illinois General Assembly passed Public Act 89 — 719 on January 7, 1997, and the Governor signed it into law on March 7, 1997. The legislation, which is referred to as the Judicial Redistricting Act of 1997 (the Act), took effect immediately upon its signing and repealed the Judicial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Winter v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. P.R.S. International, Inc. v. Shred Pax Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re Pension Reform LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Maddux v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Harold B. Smith and Illinois Republican Party v. Kenneth R. Boyle, in Their Official Capacity as Members of the Illinois State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API