Swanson v. Andrus
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, McGee, J., denying a motion for a new trial. Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal denied.
1Opinion of the Court
On motion to dismiss the following opinion was filed, October 11, 1901:
START, C. J.
Motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal herein.
A sufficiently accurate statement of the facts for the purposes of the motion is this: The plaintiff had a verdict for $15,982.79. Thereafter, and on December 11, 1900, the parties, with reference to a motion for a new trial by the defendant, entered into a stipulation, which, so far as here material, was to the effect that, in case the defendant desired to make a motion for a new trial, notice of such motion should be given prior to February 1, 1901; and, if he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cahill v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Swanson v. AndrusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Hall v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Moreland v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Levine v. Barrett & BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KahnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Williams v. HewittWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- McLaughlin v. City of BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Massaro v. Savoy Estates Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.