Legal Opinion

Doggins v. Saris

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 28, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–2397 (UNA)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Trevor N. McFadden, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs, appearing pro se , are two prisoners incarcerated at the Federal Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas. They have filed a complaint against members of the United States Sentencing Commission in their individual and official capacities and have moved to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). The IFP motion will be granted, and this case will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's case upon a determination that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted).

Plaintiffs are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Davis v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API