Legal Opinion

Bell v. Itek Leasing Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 19, 1977No. 77-84PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In this case, essentially one of first impression in Arkansas, the single issue is whether a contract by which Itek Leasing Corporation purported to lease certain printing equipment to Jerry Mike Bell for a term of five years was in actuality an installment-sale contract carrying such an excessive interest rate as to be void for usury under Arkansas law. We are unanimously of the opinion, contrary to the trial court’s conclusion, that the overwhelming preponderance of the proof shows the purported lease to have been in fact a credit sale that is void for usury. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burroughs Adding MacH. Co. v. BogdonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Sawyer v. Pioneer Leasing CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. McGalliard v. Liberty Leasing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. McKeeman v. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1970
  5. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. River Valley Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. FMA Financial Corp. v. Pro-PrintersUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Clune Equipment Leasing Corp. v. SpanglerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. K. L. C., Inc. v. Brookside Drug Store, Inc. (In Re Brookside Drug Store, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
  4. Standard Leasing Corp. v. Schmidt Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Hough v. Continental Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API