Legal Opinion
Bragdon v. Perkins-Campbell Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 13, 1898No. 14PublishedCited by 29 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The defendant sold and delivered to Albert R. Bragdon, the husband of the plaintiff, a sidesaddle; and in the statement of claim it is alleged:
“The said defendant then and there promised and agreed with the said Albert B. Bragdon, acting in behalf of the said plaintiff, that the said sidesaddle should be made by defendant especially for the use of the said plaintiff, and, that, by reason of said intended use by the said plaintiff, he would take care to make and deliver a saddle of especial strength and safety, and constructed of the best material, and by means of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Goodlander Mill Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Curtin v. SomersetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
3Cited by29 opinions
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Defore v. Bourjois, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Hasbrouck v. Armour & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.