Meade v. Collins Realty Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, J.:
There is authority for the proposition that where one party to a contract commits a minor breach in its performance which is brought to the attention of the other party, who deliberately excuses it, then the latter is deemed to have waived his right of action for damages. Restatement, Contracts, Section 411; Bye v. George W. McCaulley & Son Co., (Del. Super. 1908) 7 Penn. 115, 76 A. 621; Webster v. Beebe (Del. Super. 1910) 2 Boyce 16, 77 A. 769.
The Restatement, together with the illustrations, has this to say:
“The duty of a party to a contract to make compensation where he has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duval v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Colbath v. H. B. Stebbins Lumber Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Bye v. Mc-Caulley & Son Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1908
- Eliason v. DraperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
- Delaware Engineering Co. v. Pusey & Jones Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faill v. FaillSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
- XRI Investment Holdings LLC v. HolifieldCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
- XRI Investment Holdings LLC v. HolifieldCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022