Fry v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Dana R. Weller, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This is an action to recover one thousand dollars damages for slander of title. The defendant interposed a general demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained and judgment entered accordingly, from which plaintiff appeals. The main question thus presented for our consideration is as to whether or not the complaint states facts sufficient to state a cause of action. The slander complained of is alleged as follows:
“That on the thirtieth day of December, 1919 . . . the defendant maliciously and without cause spoke in the presence of Jacob Bosma and others of and concerning the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Robinson v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re Application of SeickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rucker v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Gilchrest House, Inc. v. Guaranteed Title & Mortgage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950