State v. Bolden
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Beier, j.:
Defendant-appellant Ricky Bolden seeks review of the district court’s summary denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He argues (a) that his due process rights were violated because his motion was denied by means of an order prepared by the State; (b) that the district court failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required; (c) that his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate a diminished capacity defense; (d) that his counsel was ineffective by failing to explain the elements of the charges and urging him to plead guilty without a sufficient…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. SolomonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. MonclaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. ShearsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. HogeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- Moll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.