Legal Opinion

Green v. Nelson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1951No. 7491PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

Action by the appellants to recover the sum of $190 allegedly due them under a correspondence school agreement which they entered into with the respondent. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the appellants for nominal damages only and from that judgment they prose*157cute this appeal. A cross-appeal by the respondent is also taken from the judgment below.

In December, 1945, the respondent entered into an “enrollment contract” with the appellants whereby he agreed to pay $225 for certain tractor and equipment training to be furnished him by the appellants. The first…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen, Heaton & McDonald, Inc. v. Castle Farm Amusement Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. International Textbook Co. v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Mount Ida School for Girls v. RoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. International Correspondence School, Inc. v. CrabtreeTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Westmount Country Club v. KamenyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Bennett v. Fun & Fitness of Silver Hill, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Bill L. Ballard, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. El Dorado Tire Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Travis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API