Legal Opinion
Gisvold v. Windbreak, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 2007No. 20060209Published
1Opinion of the Court
2007 ND 54
Joelle Gisvold, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Windbreak, Inc., Defendant and Appellee
No. 20060209.
Supreme Court North Dakota.
Decided April 19, 2007
Rex A. Hammarback, Hammarback, Dusek & Associates, P.L.C., P.O. Box 4, East Grand Forks, MN 56721-0004, for plaintiff and appellant.
Robert J. Udland (argued) and Robin A. Schmidt (appeared), Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 1389, Fargo, N.D. 58107-1389, for defendant and appellee.
Opinion of the Court by Crothers, Justice.
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶1] Joelle Gisvold appeals from a judgment denying her motion for a new trial and dismissing her negligence…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Mauch v. Manufacturers Sales & Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Cook v. StenslieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.