Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 1998No. 96051015; CA A96575PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant is charged with the intentional homicide of Carrie Hammock. ORS 163.115. The state seeks reversal of a pretrial order excluding evidence of defendant’s prior acts of violence against Hammock and statements made by her and defendant during and regarding those incidents. ORS 138.060(3). The trial court excluded the evidence under OEC 404(3) and OEC 802. The state argues that the evidence is relevant and is either nonhearsay or falls within a hearsay exception. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

For purposes of the trial court’s pretrial rulings, the state offered the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. EngweilerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. HagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API