Legal Opinion
Khan v. Fasano
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 21, 2001No. 3:01-cr-00912PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT [15]
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [1]
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO COMPEL [17]
KEEP, District Judge.
On October 26, 2001, the Court granted Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and ordered Petitioner released subject to reasonable conditions of supervision as determined by the INS. Pursuant to the Court’s order, which authorized reasonable conditions of release, including bail, the INS imposed a $3000 bail requirement on Mr. Khan on November 5, 2001.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir, Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fahim v. AshcroftDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
- Rohr, Inc. v. UPS-Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Ali v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
- Bailey v. N.D.O.C.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Chaker-Delnero v. Butler & HaileyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.