Legal Opinion

California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 2016No. F070601PublishedCited by 16 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J. —

Plaintiff California Public Records Research, Inc., sought a writ of mandate to compel the County of Stanislaus (County) to reduce the fees it charges for copies of official records. Plaintiff alleged the fees of $3 for the first page and $2 for each subsequent page exceeded County’s cost of providing the service and, therefore, violated Government Code section 27366, 1 which states that copying fees “shall be set by the board of supervisors in an amount necessary to recover the direct and indirect costs of providing the product or service . . . .”

The trial court denied…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Nat. Lawyers Guild etc. v. City of HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Sierra Club v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Brown v. Superior Court of Fresno Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API