Legal Opinion

Spring v. Domestic Sewing-Machine Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 16, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On Application for Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Nixon, D. J.

An interlocutory decree was entered in the above-stated case, in favor of the complainants, on the twenty-second day of May, 1882, and an order of reference made to the master for an account. The defendant company now comes in and asks for a rule upon the complainants to show cause why the decree should not be opened and a rehearing ordered. Four reasons are assigned for such an order, the first and second of which are frivolous, but the third and fourth seem to have merit. The third raises the question of the •want of jurisdiction of the court in equity, in view of the recent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. Lewis v. CocksSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Moore v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Carnochan v. ChristieSupreme Court of the United States · 1826

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Olsson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  3. Plotts v. Central Oil Co. of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  4. Mellwood Distilling Co. v. HarperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1908
  5. Allen v. Consolidated Fruit Jar Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API