Carnochan v. Christie
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall
Camochan &- Mitchel, the plaintiffs, were Merchants in Georgia, who had extensive commercial transactions with the defendant, William Christie, a merchant of Liverpool, in the course of which the former became indebted to the latter to a large amount. In 1819, John Camochan, one of the firm of C. & M., visited Englánd, in the expectation of selling immense tracts of land he had purchased in Florida, and, during his residence in that country, his partner, Peter Mitchel, relying, probably, on the sale of lands, continued to draw, heavily on the defendant, W. C., without making correspondent…
2Cited by44 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- De Groot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Nelson & Hatch v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.