Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Fletcher

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1979PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUKOWSKY, Justice.

These cases squarely present the question of the validity of the following provision which has been inserted in these Kentucky No Fault Automobile Insurance Policies,

“(a) any amount payable under the uninsured motor vehicle coverage [UM] shall be reduced by the amount of any personal injury protection benefits [PIP] paid or payable under this or any other automobile insurance policy because of bodily injury sustained by an eligible injured person.”

The trial courts and the Court of Appeals held the provision invalid. We agree, but find it necessary to decide a subsidiary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Louisville & NR Co. v. MacK Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWESTWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KiddKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Greenwood v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Hargett v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  5. S.J.L.S. v. T.L.S.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API