Kleven v. Gunderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action of ejectment in the district court for Lac qui Parle count)-. The case was tried before Powers, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of a strip of land along the north line of defendant’s and appellant’s land, containing about four acres. The plaintiff and respondent is the owner of the northeast % of the southeast and the defendant the owner of the southeast ¿4 of the southeast all in section 31, township 119, range 42. The boundary line between the lands of the parties depends upon the location of the lost quarter corner on the east line of section 31. *248Part of Lac qui Parle lies within the northeast corner of this township. That part of the township is thereby made…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Newsom v. Pryor's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bolton v. LannTexas Supreme Court · 1856
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moscrip v. Webster Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Propper v. WohlwendNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Grandt v. Town of PokegamaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925