Legal Opinion

Grandt v. Town of Pokegama

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1925No. 24,471PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, O. J.

Plaintiffs own the S. E. of S. E. of Sections 16-39-21. Defendant Minse owns the N. E.J of N. E. i of Section 21, which adjoins plaintiffs’ land on the south. The line between these lands is in dispute. The town board tore plaintiffs’ fence down, destroyed growing crops and graded a road where they claimed the line was located. The court awarded $300 damages and determined the location of the boundary line. Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the findings or for a new trial.

The trial court located the boundary line as being on and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stadin v. HelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Goroski v. TawneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Sommer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Kleven v. GundersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API