Grandt v. Town of Pokegama
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, O. J.
Plaintiffs own the S. E. of S. E. of Sections 16-39-21. Defendant Minse owns the N. E.J of N. E. i of Section 21, which adjoins plaintiffs’ land on the south. The line between these lands is in dispute. The town board tore plaintiffs’ fence down, destroyed growing crops and graded a road where they claimed the line was located. The court awarded $300 damages and determined the location of the boundary line. Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the findings or for a new trial.
The trial court located the boundary line as being on and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stadin v. HelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Goroski v. TawneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Sommer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Kleven v. GundersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980