Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Craft v. Schisler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1988No. 87-1814PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we are again asked whether a city council must hold its meetings in public when required to do so by charter. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it must, and that relators are entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus.

Section 4 of the Charter of the City of Portsmouth provides:

“At seven o’clock P.M. on the first Monday in January following a regular municipal election the Council shall meet at the usual place for holding Council meetings and the newly elected members shall assume the duties of office. Thereafter the Council shall meet at such times as may be prescribed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Repository, Div. of Thompson Newspapers, Inc. v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Bloomingdale v. City of FairbornOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State, Ex Rel. Elchlinger v. RamserOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. RickettsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Fenley v. KygerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Inskeep v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Bond v. City of MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. Cincinnati City CouncilOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API