Legal Opinion

Fiedler v. Stacy

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 30, 2024No. 6:23-cv-01958Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ROBERT FIEDLER and MURIEL FIEDLER, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 6:23-cv-1958-CEM-RMN SUSAN STACY, NANCY BRANDT, GENNIFER BRIDGES, GINGER BOYD, ADAM J. KNIGHT, and JACQUELINE SIMMS-PETREDIS, Defendants. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“First Motion,” Doc. 2), upon which the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“First R&R,” Doc. 12), and on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“Second Motion,” Doc. 13), upon which the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API