Legal Opinion
Grimshaw v. Target Corporation
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 27, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01068Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 ELISABETH GRIMSHAW and GENE ERIC ) 4 GRIMSHAW, ) ) Case No.: 2:20-cv-01068-GMN-EJY 5 Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ORDER 6 ) 7 TARGET CORPORATION and ) METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & ) 8 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) 9 Defendants. ) 10 ) 11 Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 20), filed by Defendant 12 Target Corporation (“Target”). Plaintiffs Elisabeth Grimshaw (“Elisabeth”) and Gene 13 Grimshaw (“Gene”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a Response, (ECF No. 23), and Target filed 14 a Reply, (ECF No. 24). For the reasons…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.