Mann v. Poole
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before NORTON, J., Laurens, February, 1893. This was an action, commenced June 21, 1892, by Jacob Mann, Henry Mann, and Levi Mann, as J. & H. Mann & Co., against J. T. Poole, individually and as guardian, N. B. Dial, assignee, and the wife and wards of J.T. Poole.
Read the full summary
Before NORTON, J., Laurens, February, 1893. This was an action, commenced June 21, 1892, by Jacob Mann, Henry Mann, and Levi Mann, as J. & H. Mann & Co., against J. T. Poole, individually and as guardian, N. B. Dial, assignee, and the wife and wards of J.T. Poole. The granting clause of the deed of assignment referred to in the opinion was as follows: “How, therefore, I, the said J. T. Poole, in consideration of the premises, and of one dollar to me paid by N. B. Dial, of the County of Laurens, in said State, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold, assigned,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mb. Justice Pope.
The plaintiffs commenced their action against the defendants on the 21st June, 1892, in the Court of Common Pleas for Laurens County, in this State. The complaint substantially alleged that the defendant, J. T. Poole, who was a merchant in the town of Laurens, was indebted to the plaintiffs, a mercantile firm, for goods and merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant, J. T. Poole, during the mouths of March and September, 1891, amounting in value to $531.50, and as an evidence of this said indebtedness the defendant had made and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Porter v. StrickerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Marion, Receiver v. WestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- State v. Newland LeFeversSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Rice v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928