Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rice v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 4, 1928No. 12369Published

1Dissent

Mr. CitiEE Justice Watts

(dissenting) : This is'an appeal from the decree of his Honor, Judge Dennis. His decree sets forth the issues involved, and will be reported for an understanding of the case. The appeal from the decision of Judge Dennis challenges all the material findings of fact and rulings on points of law contained in the decree. We think that an action to set aside an alleged preference must fall within the terms of the Statute. We do not think such preferences are valid as expressly authorized, but, the true view is, are invalid as expressly prohibited under the Act.

Section 5511…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Porter v. StrickerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  2. Johns v. Charlotte, &c., RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  3. McElwee v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  4. Bewley-Darst Coal Co. v. Laurens Gin & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Lenhardt v. PonderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API