Seto v. American Elevator, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — In this case, we review a Court of Appeals decision affirming denial of Matthew Seto’s request for a trial de novo after his lawsuit against American Elevator, Inc., was submitted to mandatory arbitration. Under the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR), Seto had 20 days within which to request a trial de novo after the arbitrator filed the arbitration award and proof of service. The issue is when the 20-day period begins to run. We hold that the 20-day period to request a trial de novo begins once service of the arbitration award is complete. Thus, when service is made by mail, the 20-day…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Casaccio v. CurtissWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
- Brackman v. City of Lake Forest ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Brackman v. CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARKCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- In re the Settlement/Guardianship of A.G.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.