Legal Opinion

Seto v. American Elevator, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2007No. 77751-9PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — In this case, we review a Court of Appeals decision affirming denial of Matthew Seto’s request for a trial de novo after his lawsuit against American Elevator, Inc., was submitted to mandatory arbitration. Under the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR), Seto had 20 days within which to request a trial de novo after the arbitrator filed the arbitration award and proof of service. The issue is when the 20-day period begins to run. We hold that the 20-day period to request a trial de novo begins once service of the arbitration award is complete. Thus, when service is made by mail, the 20-day…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Casaccio v. CurtissWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Brackman v. City of Lake Forest ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Brackman v. CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARKCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. In re the Settlement/Guardianship of A.G.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API