People v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Lawyers appreciate a trial court which candidly explains the reasons for its rulings. This may help lawyers and their clients in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of their cases. This is in contrast to the trial court which utters words like “granted,” “overruled,” “denied,” “sustained” without any explanation as to how it reached its pretrial or trial rulings. A trial court which elects to explain its rulings should consider how its explanations will appear. Here, the trial court was deeply troubled by its perception of perjury. Its outpouring of candor resulted in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hernandez v. VITAMIN SHOPPE INDUSTRIES INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. QuickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016