Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1979No. 12161PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YEAGLEY, Associate Judge, Retired:

A jury found appellant guilty of rape (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2801). On appeal, he asserts reversible error was committed because (1) he was denied his right to call witnesses in his own behalf and to provide exculpatory evidence; and (2) his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was unconstitutionally abridged by the trial court’s undue limitation of his right to impeach the complainant’s credibility by cross-examination. We have considered appellant’s claims and find no errors nor abuse of discretion which warrant reversal. Accordingly, we affirm his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Winfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Beale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Sherer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API