Miller v. Miller

Gibson, P. J.,

— Plaintiff files his complaint in divorce charging defendant with indignities to the person and also charging defendant with adultery, naming Charles E. Hill as corespondent. Service was made on defendant but no service of any notice has been made on the corespondent either by plaintiff or the master. A hearing was held before a master in which the evidence produced to some extent supports both causes of divorce.

If the conduct of defendant with the corespondent were open, notorious, and a course of conduct carried on for the purpose of humiliating plaintiff, then plaintiff has…