Legal Opinion

Kristine Sandoz Allen Eric S. Sandoz v. Sheryl Ann Hall Daniel Hall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1998No. 96-35996Published

1Opinion of the Court

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge.

Kristine Sandoz Allen and Eric S. Sandoz (collectively Sandoz) brought this tort action against Sheryl Ann Hall and Daniel Hall for intentional interference with prospective inheritance, a tort which the Oregon courts have not yet embraced or rejected. The district court dismissed on the ground that the Supreme Court of Oregon would not recognize the tort.

The complaint alleged: that the Sandozes had an expectancy to inherit from their uncle, Gregory Putman; that the Hills intentionally interfered with that expectancy; that the Hills did so by the most egregious of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re the Estate of ReddawayOregon Supreme Court · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API