Legal Opinion

Midwest Ref. Co. v. George

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1932No. 1699PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blumb, Justice.

This is the second appeal in the case. Most of the facts of importance herein are detailed in the opinion in the ease on the first appeal, found in 41 Wyo. 55, 281 Pac. 1005. Only those necessary to make this opinion intelligible will be repeated, or enlarged upon, here. The Midwest Refining Company, appellant, will be designated herein as the employer, and George, the respondent, as employee.

The employee, because of injuries received on December 12, 1924, filed a claim for compensation. The parties addressed a petition to the court containing a stipulation as to tbe judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Stannard v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Rogers v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  4. Edwards v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of KimballWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Eddy v. First Wyoming Bank, N.A.-LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holmes v. HolmesWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Washington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API