Legal Opinion

James v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1979No. 7826SC930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The trial judge held that until the defendant has made his final decision after a hearing on the merits, no justiciable “case or controversy” exists and that, therefore, the case is not “ripe” for judicial scrutiny at this time. We disagree. Plaintiffs complaint raises two questions: Whether the Administrative Procedure Act (G.S. 150A-1 et seq.) is applicable and must be followed in the removal proceedings initiated by defendant and whether defendant has the authority to suspend plaintiff pending a hearing on the merits.

It is true that plaintiff is entitled to a hearing.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Wiener v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. ILLINOIS CENT. & C. RR v. Inter. Com. Comm.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank v. SavageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Eargle v. Horry CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Eargle v. Horry CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API