Legal Opinion

United States v. Horace Andrew Davis, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 3, 2002No. 01-3577PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Under an agreement preserving certain rights of appeal, Horace Andrew Davis, Jr. pled guilty to charges of attempting to manufacture methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, possession of a firearm in relation to a drug offense, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), and possession of methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 844(a). The district court 1 sentenced him to 138 months, and he raises two issues on appeal. Davis contends that the Controlled Substances Act is an unconstitutional assertion of federal jurisdiction and that his motion to suppress should have been granted. We affirm.

Polic…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Monson v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Robert Lawrence GabrioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Timothy Donald KoonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Mateo Morales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Michael K. GerardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API