Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Kipp

Syracuse City Court

Decided August 28, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony J. Gigliotti, J.

This action, pursuant to RPAPL 711, for possession and rent *861allegedly demanded and unpaid was commenced by petitioner, Morris Gilman, in his capacity as attorney-in-fact for the owners of the premises in question. The caption of the notice of petition and petition reads as follows: Morris Gilman (POA) for Randy and Michele Manheim against Judi Kipp. The petition was both executed and verified by Gilman. The owners, who apparently live out of State, previously executed the statutory short-form power of attorney as defined by General Obligations Law §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FriedmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  2. Stokes v. Village of WurtsboroNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rosenberg v. SuaresCity of New York Municipal Court · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. MelindaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Whitehead v. Town House Equities, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Dick v. Citibank, N. A.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API