Legal Opinion

Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Milwaukee Rubber Works Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin

Decided January 23, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

Action at law to recover royalties under the Grant patent, No. 554,675, dated February 18, 1896, for rubber-tired wheels. The royalties claimed amount to $4,109.42; but, deducting certain offsets, the plaintiff, if entitled to recover, should have judgment for $2,517.66 principal, with 6 per cent, interest from the time the several amounts of royalties going to make up this sum became due, with due regard to the time of the payment of the sums making up the offsets. The defenses are that the license contract securing the royalties is denounced as illegal by the Sherman…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Joint Traffic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. HenryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  3. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Diamond Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API