Ulvedal v. Heidelberg Eastern, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEPENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
EGINTON, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Yngve Ulvedal commenced this products liability action against defendants Heidelberg Eastern, Inc. and Heidelberg Druckmaschinen, A.G. (“Heidelberg”) seeking damages for injuries sustained allegedly as a result of the defective and unreasonably dangerous condition of an offset press manufactured and distributed by the defendants. Plaintiff Ulvedal’s employer, Strouts Lithographies, Inc. (“Strouts”), moved to intervene in October, 1990. The motion to intervene was granted without objection and Strouts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- L. Cohen & Co., Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Kearney v. Philips Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Malatesta v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995